Remove FINRA & BrokerCheck Records.
Pay Only After Removal.

When a disclosure has been expunged from the CRD through a FINRA Rule 2080 arbitration and court confirmation, the record should be gone. In practice, cached BrokerCheck pages and third-party aggregators frequently continue to surface the old disclosure in Google. This is the strongest de-indexing ground. Reputation Resolutions submits the outdated content and correction requests needed to clear the stale copies once the underlying expungement is confirmed.

Certain customer complaints and dispute disclosures can be expunged through FINRA Dispute Resolution when the broker meets the Rule 2080 standard, such as a claim that is factually impossible, clearly erroneous, or one the broker was not involved in. Eligibility is narrow and decided by arbitrators, not by us. Reputation Resolutions assesses whether your specific disclosure has a realistic expungement path with qualified securities counsel before any filing.

Complaints that were withdrawn, denied by the firm, or resolved without any admission or finding against the broker can sometimes be expunged or, at minimum, clarified. Where expungement is not available, the outdated or misleading republication of these items on aggregator sites can often be corrected or de-indexed. Reputation Resolutions frames the record accurately rather than overstating what a resolution changes.

A disclosure that misstates a material fact, attributes an event to the wrong person, or contains a clear clerical error can support a correction with FINRA and a de-indexing request for third-party copies. Documentation of the inaccuracy is required. Reputation Resolutions builds the evidentiary argument in the format the CRD correction process and the aggregators actually act on.

Third-party sites scrape BrokerCheck and republish disclosures, often keeping stale versions live long after the underlying record is expunged or updated. These republications are frequently removable under the site's own policy or through Google's outdated content process, independent of anything FINRA does. Reputation Resolutions targets each republication directly so the search footprint clears, not just the primary source.

Home addresses, personal phone numbers, and other private contact details sometimes appear alongside republished disclosure data on aggregator and people-search sites. This information typically qualifies for removal under Google's personal information policies and the sites' own opt-out processes. Reputation Resolutions handles these suppression and opt-out requests as part of the engagement.

It is not only prospective clients who look. Existing clients and referral partners running due diligence, recruiters and firms, compliance teams, state licensing and professional boards, investors, lenders, and even people you meet personally all search your name. A FINRA BrokerCheck disclosure near the top shapes their decision before any conversation happens.

The disclosure rarely tells the whole story. A disclosure that was expunged, withdrawn, settled without admission, or is decades old still reads as a red flag to anyone skimming a search result, and you almost never get the chance to explain the context behind it.

It gains search authority the longer it sits. These pages do not fade on their own. Every month it stays indexed, FINRA BrokerCheck and the sites republishing it accumulate more ranking signals and sink deeper into Google, which makes removal and suppression harder later, not easier.

AI answers now repeat it. ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Gemini synthesize high-authority sources like FINRA BrokerCheck and its aggregators into direct answers about you. An indexed disclosure, even an expunged one, shapes what AI tells anyone who asks, not just what they find in the blue links.

A disclosure cited by an AI tool as background fact is more damaging than a link the reader never clicked, especially when the record was already expunged. Clearing it at the source is the only reliable way to eliminate it from both.

Surfaces BrokerCheck and aggregator disclosures in name-search responses. Expungement plus Google clearance causes ChatGPT to stop citing the record as models refresh their indexed data.

Directly indexes BrokerCheck and aggregator pages and includes them in AI Overview summaries at the top of name-search results. Google clearance accelerates removal from AI Overviews simultaneously.

Cites live web sources in real-time search responses. A de-indexed or removed disclosure URL stops being surfaced as a source as soon as it returns access-restricted.

Draws from Google's indexed data. Google clearance, included in every engagement at no charge, addresses the Gemini citation pathway directly.

It depends on the record. A valid, current regulatory disclosure that accurately reflects a customer complaint, arbitration, or termination generally cannot simply be deleted from BrokerCheck. Some disclosures can be expunged through a FINRA Rule 2080 arbitration when the broker meets a narrow eligibility standard. Separately, records that are already expunged, withdrawn, resolved, or inaccurate frequently remain indexed by Google and republished by third-party aggregators, and those copies can often be removed or de-indexed. Reputation Resolutions tells you honestly which path applies to your specific record before you commit to anything.

Sometimes. Expungement of a customer dispute disclosure runs through FINRA Dispute Resolution arbitration under Rule 2080, and the arbitrators must find that the claim was factually impossible or clearly erroneous, that the broker was not involved, or that it is false. The award must then be confirmed by a court. Eligibility is narrow and decided by the arbitrators, not by us. We coordinate the expungement with qualified securities counsel where there is a realistic path, and we will not promise expungement for a disclosure that does not meet the standard.

Often, yes. When a disclosure has been expunged, withdrawn, or resolved, cached BrokerCheck pages and third-party aggregator copies frequently keep surfacing the stale version in Google. Those outdated pages can usually be de-indexed through Google's outdated content removal process and the aggregators' own removal policies. This is separate from the FINRA record itself. Reputation Resolutions submits these de-indexing and correction requests as part of the engagement.

There are two layers. First, the underlying record: if it is expungement-eligible, we coordinate the Rule 2080 arbitration; if it is already expunged or resolved, no further FINRA action is needed. Second, the search footprint: we submit outdated content removals to Google and removal or correction requests to every aggregator republishing the disclosure. Removing it from one place while leaving copies on several others does not solve the problem, so we map the full footprint at intake.

Timelines vary by path. A Rule 2080 expungement arbitration runs on FINRA's schedule and can take several months to a year through hearing and court confirmation. De-indexing already-expunged or outdated copies from Google and clearing aggregator republications is much faster, often a few weeks. After a record is expunged or confirmed outdated, Google may still show cached URLs for 30 to 90 days unless a formal outdated content request is submitted, which we handle in every engagement.

Pricing depends on which path your record requires, the number of disclosures and aggregator sites involved, and whether an expungement arbitration is in scope. Reputation Resolutions charges nothing upfront for our removal work, and our fee is collected only after removal is confirmed. Note that a Rule 2080 expungement arbitration involves separate securities-counsel and FINRA filing fees, which we explain clearly at intake. Schedule a free review for a case-specific assessment at no charge and no obligation.

We tell you that directly and early. A valid, current regulatory disclosure that accurately reflects a finding against you generally cannot be erased, and a customer dispute that does not meet the Rule 2080 standard is unlikely to be expunged. In those cases we do not take your money for an outcome we cannot deliver. We will explain what is and is not achievable, and where suppression or aggregator cleanup can still reduce the search visibility of the record even when the primary disclosure stays in place.

Yes. BrokerCheck and the aggregators that republish it carry high domain authority and are frequently drawn on by ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Gemini when generating summaries about financial professionals. In 2026 this matters because an AI tool can surface a disclosure, including an outdated or already-expunged one, as background fact in response to a name search, often before the person asking ever clicks a link. When the underlying record is expunged and the URLs are cleared from Google, AI tools lose access to that content as a source and typically stop citing it within days to weeks.

Not automatically. Once a disclosure is expunged from the CRD, BrokerCheck should stop displaying it, but Google may continue showing cached BrokerCheck URLs and third-party aggregator copies for weeks or longer. Reputation Resolutions submits a formal request to Google's outdated content tool and pursues each aggregator separately at no additional charge, so the search results clear rather than lingering after the expungement is confirmed.

Almost never. The same disclosure data is republished by the SEC IAPD system, state securities regulators, and third-party aggregators, and personal contact details can appear on people-search platforms. These sites operate independently and require separate removal requests. Reputation Resolutions maps every site surfacing your disclosure at the start of the engagement so the full footprint is addressed, not just BrokerCheck itself.

Possibly. A complaint that was withdrawn, denied by the firm, or settled without any admission or finding against the broker can sometimes be expunged through Rule 2080, and where expungement is not available the outdated or misleading republication of the item on aggregator sites can often be corrected or de-indexed. A settlement does not automatically remove a disclosure. Reputation Resolutions assesses your specific resolution and advises whether a removal path exists before any filing.

A disclosure that misstates a material fact, attributes an event to the wrong person, or contains a clear clerical error can support a correction with FINRA and a de-indexing request for third-party copies. Documentation of the inaccuracy is required; a written assertion alone is not enough. Reputation Resolutions builds the evidentiary argument in the format the CRD correction process and the aggregators actually act on.

It depends on the language and the facts. A U5 termination-for-cause disclosure that accurately reflects what happened generally cannot be deleted, but disputes over inaccurate or unfair U5 language are sometimes addressed through arbitration or expungement, and outdated republications on aggregator sites can be de-indexed. We review the specific U5 wording and advise honestly on whether any removal, correction, or suppression path is realistic.

Yes. A Rule 2080 expungement is a legal arbitration proceeding, so we coordinate the filing and hearing with qualified securities attorneys and handle the de-indexing and aggregator cleanup ourselves. You get one team managing the full picture rather than juggling a lawyer for the arbitration and a separate vendor for the search results. We explain the division of work and the associated legal costs clearly before anything begins.

The two layers each have traps. A Rule 2080 expungement is a formal arbitration with a narrow legal standard and a court-confirmation step that most people are not equipped to navigate alone. The de-indexing and aggregator layer requires knowing each site's removal policy and how Google's outdated content process actually works. Reputation Resolutions has handled thousands of removal engagements and coordinates both layers so a record is not expunged while stale copies keep ranking, or de-indexed while the primary record stays live.

On October 16, 2023, FINRA put new expungement rules into effect under Regulatory Notice 23-12. A straight-in expungement request now has to be heard by a unanimous panel of three specially trained public arbitrators rather than a single arbitrator, state securities regulators receive notice and may attend and participate in the hearing, and strict filing deadlines now apply. In practice these changes made customer-dispute expungement harder to obtain and time-sensitive. Reputation Resolutions factors these rules into the honest eligibility read we give you before any filing, and where expungement is not realistic we focus on de-indexing and suppressing the search footprint instead.

Yes, for straight-in requests. Under the rules effective October 16, 2023, FINRA generally will not consider a straight-in expungement request filed more than three years after the customer complaint was first reported in the CRD, or more than two years after a related customer arbitration or court case is fully resolved. If that window has closed, the disclosure usually stays on the record, and the practical option becomes de-indexing outdated copies and suppressing the remaining footprint. We assess where your dates fall as part of the free review, at no cost.

A straight-in request is an expungement arbitration a broker files on their own, separately from any underlying customer dispute, specifically to seek removal of a disclosure. Since the 2023 rule changes it carries added requirements, including notice to the customer and to state securities regulators and a unanimous decision by a three-arbitrator panel, followed by court confirmation. It is a formal legal proceeding, so we coordinate it with qualified securities counsel where there is a realistic path, and we handle the search-visibility side ourselves.

The Form U4 is filed when a broker registers with a firm and reports items such as customer complaints, regulatory actions, liens, and certain criminal or financial matters. The Form U5 is filed when a broker leaves a firm and reports the reason for departure, including a termination for cause. Both feed the CRD and can appear on BrokerCheck. Whether either can be expunged or corrected depends on the specific item and the facts. We review the exact U4 or U5 language and advise honestly on whether any removal, correction, or suppression path is realistic.

Often, yes, and this is a core part of what we do when a disclosure is valid and has to stay. Suppression does not delete the record. It builds and strengthens accurate, high-authority results for your name, such as a professional biography, verified profiles, and legitimate press coverage, so the BrokerCheck page and its aggregator copies no longer dominate the first page of a name search. We are clear that suppression manages visibility rather than erasing the underlying disclosure, and we pair it with de-indexing of any outdated or already-expunged copies that should not be ranking at all.

Reputation Resolutions has been operating since 2013 and has served more than 5,000 clients, including financial advisors, brokers, and RIAs dealing with FINRA BrokerCheck disclosures and their republications. That experience informs how we assess each new case, including a realistic read on which disclosures have an expungement path and which are better addressed through de-indexing and suppression.