Remove News & Broadcast Videos. From Search. Pay Only After Removal.

When a segment covered an arrest, charge or case that was later dismissed, dropped, expunged or resolved in your favor, some outlets will update the story, remove a name or unpublish it under their own update policies. Court documentation of the outcome is what makes the request reviewable. Some outlets add an update instead, which we also pursue.

Footage recorded in a private setting, such as inside a home, raises privacy questions that many newsroom standards address, and YouTube's privacy complaint process covers clips where you are uniquely identifiable.

A segment with a materially false statement of fact, such as a wrong name, a misidentification or an inaccurate claim presented as fact, is a basis for a correction request. Outlets usually correct the segment or add an editor's note. Some will remove the clip when a correction cannot fix the error.

Video that shows a home address, phone number, or financial or medical details can be raised with the outlet, reported under YouTube's privacy rules when the clip is hosted there, and in some cases submitted to Google under its personal information policies.

Coverage that identifies a minor in connection with a legal matter or a sensitive personal situation is something many newsroom standards treat with extra care. We raise it with the outlet and with the hosting platform, and we handle these requests discreetly.

Video that was digitally altered, spliced out of context or generated synthetically and presented as real coverage can be reported to the outlet and under the hosting platform's rules on manipulated media. Evidence of the manipulation is required. If the clip sits on YouTube or another platform and not on a news site, the platform's own process is the route.

The transcript can rank on its own. Many station websites publish a transcript with the video, and Google can index that text separately. Even after the video is removed from the station, the transcript can keep appearing in search until a Google clearance request is submitted.

Syndication multiplies the copies. A single local segment can appear on the station site, affiliate sites, aggregators and YouTube news channels. Removing the original without mapping every copy leaves the content circulating on pages you have not seen.

AI tools can cite news transcripts and syndicated coverage. AI answer tools draw on indexed web pages, including news transcripts and syndicated copies. When a source is removed or de-indexed, answers that relied on it can change as those tools refresh, on their own schedules.

A removed transcript is one less source for an AI summary. That is the part we can act on.

Can summarize indexed web content about a person, including news pages and transcripts. Removing the video and clearing the transcript removes that source.

Draws on Google's own index. Our Google clearance requests for the page, the thumbnail and the transcript address what that index holds.

Cites live web sources. Once a page or transcript is gone or de-indexed, it stops being available to cite as the tool refreshes.

Built on Google's systems. Clearing the page and transcript from Google's index addresses the main source it would draw on.

Yes, in the right cases. Removal is most realistic when the segment involves a legal matter that was later dismissed or expunged, a factual error that was never corrected, private information, footage recorded in a private setting, or a copy hosted on a platform whose policies it breaks. Where an outlet keeps the story, an update, a name removal, de-indexing or suppression may still be possible. We tell you which fits your video during the free consultation, before you commit to anything.

We do. We map every copy of the video, prepare a documented request, send it through the outlet's corrections or standards channel or the platform's reporting process, and follow up. You provide the URL and any court documents. The consultation and your case are handled confidentially.

It depends on the outlet and the route. Outlets and platforms review requests on their own schedules, and cases with several syndicated copies or a legal step take longer. We give you a realistic expectation after the footprint assessment, keep you updated, and work the full footprint: the source video, the hosting article, the thumbnail in Google Images, the indexed transcript, and any syndicated versions.

A first refusal is not always the end. If there are further grounds or documents, such as court records the editor has not seen, we present them. If the outlet still declines, we move to the next outcome: an update or name removal, de-indexing where Google's policies apply, or suppression. We tell you how strong your grounds are before any request is made.

The request itself. A message through a general contact form is easy to overlook and often leaves out what an editor needs. We prepare a documented request that sets out the specific ground, the supporting records and the outcome being asked for, and we send it through the outlet's corrections, standards or editorial channel. We also map every copy of the video, not just the one link you found.

Outlets can republish archived coverage, and syndicated copies can resurface on other sites. Tell us if a removed video reappears and we will assess it and explain your options. How reappearances are handled is set out in your written agreement before work begins.

Usually not. A broadcast news video typically appears on the network or station website, one or more YouTube news channels, regional news aggregators, and in Google search results through both the article URL and the auto-generated transcript. After removal from the source, the thumbnail often persists in Google Images and the transcript can keep indexing as a separate document. We address all of these surfaces as part of a standard engagement: source video, article page, thumbnail, transcript, and known syndications.

They can. AI tools including ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Gemini draw on indexed web pages, which can include the article that embeds the video, the auto-generated transcript, and secondary articles written about the broadcast. Removing the video and clearing the transcript from search removes those sources, and AI answers that relied on them can change as the tools refresh.

Often, and this is one of the most actionable grounds we work with. When a segment covered an arrest, charge or legal proceeding that was later dismissed, dropped, expunged or resolved in your favor, some outlets will review a request to remove, anonymize or update the coverage when they are given court documentation of the outcome. We prepare that request with the documentation and send it through the outlet's corrections or standards channel.

Often, yes. No reply to a personal message is not a formal denial, and it does not exhaust your options. A documented request with supporting evidence, sent through the outlet's corrections or standards channel and tied to its own policies, is more likely to be reviewed. We tell you up front how strong your grounds are.

Yes, through two main routes. If the clip is on the station's own YouTube channel, the request goes to the station, and a removal there takes the upload down. If someone else uploaded it, YouTube's privacy complaint process applies when you are uniquely identifiable in the video, for example by your image, full name or home address. A video about you that is not news coverage is covered by our YouTube video removal service.

Where you own the footage, yes. We prepare the notice and explain how the process works before anything is filed. Where the station owns the footage, the strongest routes are a request to the station and, for clips on YouTube, its privacy complaint process.

This is one of the most common secondary footprint problems, and it is the step most unassisted attempts miss. When a video is removed from its source, Google's cached thumbnail can persist in Google Images for weeks or longer. We submit targeted image removal requests to clear the cached thumbnail as part of every standard engagement, at no additional charge for thumbnails identified at intake.

Accuracy alone does not decide it. An accurate video may still qualify on privacy grounds, for example a segment that showed your home address, filmed you inside a private residence, or covered a medical or financial situation. It may also qualify for an update or removal under the outlet's own policy if the legal matter it covered was later dismissed or expunged. We assess each case on its specific grounds and tell you where yours stands.

A single local news segment can appear on the station website, the network affiliate site, a regional news aggregator, YouTube, and several wire-service platforms within hours of airing. We map the full syndication footprint before any submission is made, prioritize removals by search visibility impact, and address syndicated versions as part of the same engagement at no additional charge for surfaces identified at intake.

Often, yes. When an outlet declines full deletion, we work down a clear ladder of outcomes. First we pursue de-indexing, where the outlet applies a noindex directive or drops the page from its sitemap so the video stops surfacing in Google while the outlet keeps its internal archive. For anyone searching your name, the practical effect is close to removal. Where a legal matter was later dropped, dismissed, or expunged, we also pursue de-identification: your name removed from the headline and body, the thumbnail replaced, and an accurate editor's note added. Where those are not available, suppression builds accurate higher-authority content so the video falls off the first page. We tell you at the free consultation which of these your case reaches.

Yes, and this is a frequently overlooked outcome. Many outlets will agree to update a segment: removing your name from the headline and body copy, replacing a mugshot or identifying thumbnail with a neutral image, and appending an editor's note when a charge was dropped, dismissed, or expunged. Because most name-search harm comes from your name appearing in the indexed title and transcript, de-identification like this can take the video out of your name results even when the page stays live. We request this update path as part of the same engagement whenever full removal is declined.

We work on a pay-after-removal basis: there is no retainer and no upfront fee. Because every case differs in the number of surfaces involved, the outlets and platforms in play, and the grounds available, we provide a clear written quote during the free consultation, after the footprint assessment. If a surface is not removed, you owe nothing for that surface.

Yes, one copy at a time. A broadcast segment that has been reuploaded to several YouTube channels, aggregator sites or social platforms is a mirror problem, and each copy has its own route. We map every known copy at intake, not just the URL you provide, prioritize them by how visible they are in search, and work the copies on the same engagement. If a copy reappears after confirmed removal, tell us and we will assess it.

The free consultation includes a written assessment of the video's current footprint across platforms and search, an evaluation of which removal grounds apply, a clear timeline and process explanation, and transparent pricing. There is no retainer, no upfront cost, and no obligation to proceed. Schedule your FREE consultation to get started.