For Individuals and Businesses Named in Casetext Pages
Remove Casetext Pages
Pay Only After Removal
Casetext is now part of Thomson Reuters, and its homepage now goes to Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel. But older Casetext pages, including case commentary and filing documents, are still indexed in Google and can still rank for your name. We find them, pursue removal through the right channel, clear them from search, and you pay only after removal is confirmed.
Pay Only After Removal
Strategy by Anthony Will, Founder & CEO · 13+ years in ORM · 5,000+ clients- Casetext is now Thomson Reuters. casetext.com now redirects to Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel page, so old Casetext removal advice is out of date. Older Casetext pages are still indexed in Google. Casetext today →
- The route is a privacy request plus the source. Thomson Reuters publishes privacy request channels. Where a page republishes a filing or commentary, the original record or publisher is often part of the route. Removal routes →
- You pay only on results. No retainer and no upfront fee. Our fee is collected only after the page is removed and confirmed. Our process →
What is Casetext court record removal?
The short answer
Casetext court record removal is the process of getting a Casetext page that names you removed and cleared from Google. Casetext began as a legal research platform that published case law, commentary, and filings. It is now part of Thomson Reuters, and casetext.com now redirects to Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel page. Even so, older Casetext content remains in Google's index, including analysis articles under casetext.com and filing documents hosted on an artifacts subdomain, and those can rank for a person's name. Thomson Reuters publishes an email address and a request portal for privacy requests. The strongest cases combine a documented request with a change to the source: a sealing or redaction order for a filing, or a correction from the original publisher of republished commentary. We assess which applies to your page before you commit.
How Reputation Resolutions handles Casetext
Casetext has changed hands and changed shape, which is why most advice about it online is out of date. Its main site now points to a Thomson Reuters AI product, but the pages Google already indexed did not all disappear, and a filing or commentary page that names you can still sit in your search results.
We start with a free search for every Casetext address that mentions you: analysis articles, case pages, and filing documents on its artifacts subdomain. We then work out what each one is. A filing that was sealed or redacted points to a court order. Commentary that came from a law firm or publisher points to that publisher as well as to Thomson Reuters. For the host itself, we prepare a documented request through the privacy channels Thomson Reuters publishes, and we work the Google side so removed pages stop showing in search.
We are direct about the limits. Thomson Reuters is not required to remove accurate public court material because it is old, and some pages may be impossible to remove. We only take cases with a realistic route, and our fee is collected only after the page is confirmed removed.
Casetext Today
What has changed, and what is still online
casetext.com now leads to CoCounsel
Visiting casetext.com now takes you to Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel product page. Casetext is no longer a free-standing case law site, so removal guides written before the change describe a service that no longer works that way.
Old Casetext pages are still indexed
A Google search of casetext.com still returns analysis articles dating back years and documents hosted on a separate artifacts subdomain, such as court forms, budgets, and filings. A name inside one of these can still surface.
Some pages republish outside content
Casetext analysis pages often carry commentary and client alerts that were written by outside law firms or publishers. For those, the original publisher can be part of the removal route alongside Thomson Reuters.
Thomson Reuters publishes privacy channels
Thomson Reuters' privacy statement gives an email address for privacy comments and complaints, and a request portal for other privacy requests. These are the published routes for a request about Casetext-hosted content.
Google is a separate problem
Even when a source page is removed, Google can keep showing the old result for a while. We use Google's own tools so the result drops from search as well.
Removal Routes
The routes that can change a Casetext page
A Thomson Reuters privacy request
We prepare a documented request through the privacy channels Thomson Reuters publishes, identifying each Casetext address and the specific information to remove or redact.
A sealing or redaction order for a filing
For documents on the artifacts subdomain that are court filings, a sealing or redaction order is the strongest support, because it changes the underlying record.
The original publisher of republished commentary
Where a Casetext analysis page republishes a law firm's or publisher's article, we ask the original publisher to correct or remove it as well, which can change what Casetext carries.
Clearing Google results
We use Google's personal-information and outdated-content tools so a changed or removed Casetext page drops from search, and we monitor for re-indexing.
How It Works
How we handle a Casetext case
- 01
Free page search and assessment
Know your footprint.We find every Casetext address that mentions you, work out what each one is, and tell you honestly what is realistic. No cost. No commitment.
- 02
Build the request
Not a general request.We assemble any court orders and the facts and prepare requests tied to the specific page and information.
- 03
Submit, follow up, and clear Google
Both sides covered.We submit through the published channels, contact original publishers where relevant, follow up, and work the Google side.
- 04
You pay only after removal
Pay after. Not before.Our fee is collected only after the page is confirmed removed. If it stays up, you owe nothing for it.
Free to find out where you stand.
Get a free, honest assessment of what we can actually do, with no upfront cost and no obligation.
Honest Timelines
Honest timelines
Thomson Reuters does not publish a turnaround for these requests, so these are realistic ranges, not promises.
Thomson Reuters' privacy statement does not give a turnaround for a request about a specific page.
That step runs on the court's schedule and usually involves an attorney.
After a source page changes, search results can take time to update. We use Google's tools to speed it up.
Thomson Reuters is not required to remove accurate public court material because it is old. We tell you before you commit.
AI Search & LLMs
What ChatGPT & Google AI Overviews say about you
More people now read an AI answer before they ever click a result. For you, that answer is the new first impression. If it repeats an old complaint, a false claim, or a competitor's talking point, it shapes the decision before you even know the conversation happened.
The answer is assembled from sources. We change the sources.
ChatGPTGoogle AI Overviews
Gemini
Perplexity
ClaudeAI answers trace back to what ranks
Google says its AI Overviews are grounded in its core Search ranking, and ChatGPT and Perplexity cite what is indexed and authoritative. So what AI says about you is not random, it comes from sources you can actually influence.
We audit what AI says today
We prompt ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews the way real people ask about you, document every answer, and trace each claim back to the source feeding it.
We correct it at the source
We remove or suppress the false and damaging sources, strengthen accurate authoritative content, and reinforce your verified entity data and Knowledge Panel, so as the models re-read the web their answers move with the truth.
We are honest about the limits
No one can edit an AI model's output directly, and we will not pretend otherwise. Change comes from the sources and takes time as models refresh; we monitor each engine and re-check rather than assume one fix holds.
Monitor
We track what AI says about you, monthly
A recurring prompt panel across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google's AI Overviews logs how you are described, what gets cited, and what changed, so a bad answer is caught before it spreads.
AI reputation monitoring →Influence
We change the sources AI draws from
No one can edit an AI's answer directly. We correct, remove, or outrank the sources behind it, structure your own site so models cite it (LLM SEO), and build presence on the third-party surfaces models trust (LLM seeding).
LLM seeding & LLM SEO →Why We're Different
Doing it yourself vs. Reputation Resolutions
| Feature | Contacting Casetext Yourself | Reputation Resolutions |
|---|---|---|
| Finding the pages | Search by hand and miss the filings on subdomains | We find every Casetext address that names you |
| The request | A short note that the page is old or unfair | A documented request tied to a specific ground |
| Google results | Easy to overlook | Handled as part of the case |
| Cost | Free, but often no result | No upfront fee. You pay only after removal is confirmed |
| Honesty | No one tells you if it is a long shot | We tell you up front, and decline cases with no realistic route |
Who runs your case
Senior specialists, no junior handoffs
Reputation Resolutions is run and managed by a world-class team of online reputation management experts. Your case is handled by senior, multidisciplinary specialists: removal strategists who know each platform's rulebook, SEO and content experts who rebuild your search results, legal partners for the matters that need them, veteran PR professionals, and AI-search specialists who help you control what LLMs like ChatGPT say about you. There are no junior handoffs and no learning on your case, and every person here treats your name as if it were their own.
Get Started
Schedule a Free Consultation With Our Court Record Specialists
A free search for every Casetext page that names you, whether a realistic removal route exists, and no cost unless it comes down.
Free & Confidential Consultation
What do you need help with?
Tap everything that applies, for you or your business.
Prefer to talk? Call 855-239-5322
Casetext FAQs
Casetext Record Removal, Answered Honestly.
The same straight talk we give every client on their free consultation.
Casetext was a legal research platform and is now part of Thomson Reuters. Visiting casetext.com now takes you to Thomson Reuters' CoCounsel product page. Older Casetext pages, including analysis articles and filing documents hosted on a separate subdomain, are still indexed in Google.
Casetext published case law, commentary, and filings, and documents that mention a party, an attorney, or a company can be indexed in search. Even though the main site now redirects, an older page that names you can still rank.
Sometimes. Thomson Reuters publishes privacy request channels, and the strongest cases combine a documented request with a change to the source, such as a sealing or redaction order for a filing, or a correction from the original publisher of republished commentary. We assess your pages and tell you before you commit.
Thomson Reuters' privacy statement says comments, complaints, or questions can be emailed to its privacy enquiries address, and it provides a request portal for other privacy requests. We prepare the request with the specific addresses and information to remove, and follow up.
They are documents hosted on a separate Casetext subdomain, such as court forms, filings, and other PDFs. Google still indexes some of them. If your name appears in one, we treat it like a court-record case and look for a sealing or redaction route.
No. The same case can appear on many sites, and the court's own record remains public. We map every place your case appears and work through them, so Casetext is one part of a broader cleanup.
Not instantly. Google can keep showing an old result for a while after a page changes. We use Google's personal-information and outdated-content tools so the result drops from search, and we monitor for re-indexing.
Yes. An order that seals, redacts, or expunges a record is the strongest support for a request, because it changes the underlying record. We include the order with a specific request and follow up.
Thomson Reuters does not publish a turnaround for these requests, and court orders run on the court's schedule. We give you a realistic estimate for your case rather than a best case.
Then the realistic options are Google-side relief where it applies and suppression, which builds stronger results for your name so the page falls out of view. Suppression is an ongoing program rather than a pay-after-removal service, and we explain the difference on your consultation.
No. Reputation Resolutions is not a law firm. Sealing, redaction, and expungement orders come from courts, usually through an attorney, and we coordinate with you on what is needed.
The assessment is free and there is no upfront fee. Our fee is collected only after the page is confirmed removed, and if it is not you owe nothing for it. We give you a transparent quote on the consultation.
Still not sure if your situation qualifies?
Get a straight answer from a senior specialist in one call: free, confidential, and you'll know exactly where you stand before you decide anything.
Sources & References
